|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
||
|
 |
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
Law
Review Articles Index
of Law Review Articles Relating to the Issue of Same-Sex "Marriage" The
following articles contain substantive discussions of the issue of
same-sex "marriage". This list includes articles supporting
and opposing same-sex "marriage."
David
Link, Comment, The Tie That Binds: Recognizing Privacy and the
Family Commitments of Same-Sex Couples 23 Loy. L.a. L. Rev. 1055
(1990) Dwight
J. Penas, Comment, Bless the Tie That Binds: A Puritan- Covenant
Case for Same-Sex Marriage 8 Law & Ineq. J. 533 (1990) Lisa
R. Zimmer, Note, Family, Marriage, and the Same-Sex Couple 12
Cardozo L. Rev. 681 (1990)
Ruth
Colker, Marriage 3 Yale J.L. & Feminism 321 (1991) Davina
Cooper & Didi Herman, Getting "The Family Right":
Legislating Heterosexuality in Harlon
L. Dalton, Reflections on the Lesbian and Gay Marriage Debate 1
Law & Sexuality 1 (1991) Mary
C. Dunlap, The Lesbian and Gay Marriage Debate: A Microcosm of Our
Hopes and Troubles in the Nineties 1 Law & Sexuality 63 (1991) Kris
Franklin, Note, A Family Like Any Other Family: Alternative Methods
of Defining Family in Law 18 N.Y.U. Rev. L. & Soc. Change 1027
(1990-91) Nan
D. Hunter, Marriage, Law and Gender: A Feminist Inquiry 1 Law
& Sexuality 9 (1991) Herma
H. Kay, Private Choices and Public Policy: Confronting the
Limitations of Marriage 5 Aust. J. Fam. L. 69 (1991) Marianne
H. Pedersen, Susan
L. Phillips, Comment, Chromosome Loophole: Homosexual Marriage
Should Be Legalized Based on Transsexual Marriages 7 Philadelphia
L. Rev. 73 (1991) William
B. Rubenstein, We Are Family: A Reflection on the Search for Legal
Recognition of Lesbian and Gay Relationships 8 J.L. & Pol. 89
(1991) Edward
A Slavin, Jr., What Makes a Marriage Legal: Here Is the Case for
Legitimizing Gay Relationships 18 Hum. Rts. Q. 16 (1991) Mark
Strasser, Family, Definitions, and the Constitution: On the
Antimiscegenation Analogy 25 Mary
P. Treuthart, Adopting a More Realistic Definition of
"Family" 26 Gonz. L. Rev. 91 (1990-91) Adrienne
K. Wilson, Note, Same-Sex Marriage: A Review 17 Wm. Mitchell L.
Rev. 539 (1991) Bruce
Ziff, Recent Developments in Canadian Law: Marriage and Divorce
26 Ottawa L. Rev. 139 (1991)
Kristin
Bullock, Comment, Applying Marvin v. Marvin to Same-Sex
Couples: A Proposal for a Sex-Preference Neutral Cohabitation Contract
Statute 25 U.C. Davis L. Rev. 1029 (1992) Michael
L. Closen & Carol R. Heise, HIV-AIDS and the Non-Traditional
Family: The Argument for State and Federal Judicial Recognition of
Danish Same-Sex Marriages 16 Nova L. Rev. 809 (1992) Andrew
H. Friedman, Same-Sex Marriage and the Right to Privacy: Abandoning
Scriptural, Canonical, and Natural Law Based Definitions of Marriage
35 How. L.J. 173 (1992) Robin
Mackenzie, Transsexuals' Legal Sexual Status and Same Sex Marriage
in New Zealand: M v. M. 7 Otago L. Rev. 556 (1992) Julienne
C. Scocca, Comment, Society's Ban on Same-Sex Marriages: A
Reevaluation of the So- Called "Fundamental Right" of
Marriage 2 Seton Hall Const. L.J. 719 (1992) Tale
of Two Cities: AIDS and the Legal Recognition of Domestic Partnership
in San Francisco and New York
2 Law & Sexuality 181 (1992)
N.
Kathleen Banks, Comment, Knodel v. British Columbia (Medical
Services Commission), 11 Can. J. Fam. L. 287 (1993) Mary
Anne Case, Couples and Coupling in the Public Sphere: A Comment on
the Legal History of Litigating for Lesbian and Gay Rights 79 Va.
L. Rev. 1643 (1993) Otis
R. Damslet, Note, Same-Sex Marriage 10 N.Y.L. Sch. J. Hum. Rts.
555 (1993) William
N. Eskridge, Jr., A History of Same-Sex Marriage 79 Va. L. Rev.
1419 (1993) Jennifer
L. Heeb, Comment, Homosexual Marriage, the Changing American
Family, and the Heterosexual Right to Privacy 24 Seton Hall L.
Rev. 347 (1993) Deborah
M. Henson, Comment, A Comparative Analysis of Same-Sex Partnership
Protections: Recommendations for American Reform 7 Int'l J.l. &
Fam. 282 (1993) Edward
J. Juel, Note, Non-Traditional Family Values: Providing
Quasi-Marital Rights to Same-Sex Couples 13 B.C. Third World L.J.
317 (1993) Patricia
LeFebour, Same-Sex Spousal Recognition in Ontario: Declarations and
Denials: A Class Perspective 9 J.L. & Soc. Pol'y 272 (1993) Martha
Minow, All in the Family & in All Families: Membership, Loving;
and Owing 95 W. Va. L. Rev. 275 (1993) Milton
C. Regan, Jr., Reason, Tradition, and Family Law: A Comment on
Social Constructionism 79 Va. L. Rev. 1515 (1993) Peter
Rusk, Same-Sex Spousal Benefits and the Evolving Conception of
Family 52 U. Toronto Fac. L. Rev. 170 (1993) Erik
J. Toulon, Call the Caterer: Hawaii to Host First Same-Sex Marriage
3 S. Cal. Rev. L. & Women's Stud. 109 (1993) James
Trosino, Note, American Wedding: Same-Sex Marriage and the
Miscegenation Analogy 73 B.U. L.Rev. 93 (1993) Sexual
Orientation and Spousal Status: The Unresolved Question
3 Nat. J. Const. l. 288 (1993)
Amy
R. Brownstein, Comment, Why Same-Sex Spouses Should Be Granted
Preferential Immigration Status: Reevaluating Adams v. Howerton,
16 Loy. L.A. Int'l & Comp. L.J. 763 (1994) Robert
L. Cordell II, Same Sex Marriage: The Fundamental Right of Marriage
and an Examination of Conflict of Laws and the Full Faith and Credit
Clause 26 Colum. Hum. Rts. L. Rev. 247 (1994) Marty
K. Courson, Note, Baehr v. Lewin: Hawaii Takes a Tentative Step to
Legalize Same-Sex Marriage 24 GOLDEN GATE U. L. REV. 41 (1994) Barbara
J. Cox, Same-Sex Marriage and Choice of Law: If We Marry in Hawaii,
Are We Still Married When We Return Home? 1994 WIS. L. REV. 1033
(1994) Jonathan
Deitrich, Comment, The Lessons of the Law: Same-Sex Marriage and
Baehr v. Lewin, 78 MARQ. L. REV. 121 (1994) Beatrice
Dohrn, Defining Family: Gays, Lesbians and the Meaning of the
Family 3 WM. & MARY BILL RTS. J. 285 (1994) Richard
A. Epstein, Caste and the Civil Rights Laws: From Jim Crow to
Same-Sex Marriages 92 MICH. L. REV. 2456 (1994) William
M. Hohengarten, Note, Same- Sex Marriage and the Right of Privacy
103 YALE L.J. 1495 (1994) Steven
K. Homer, Note, Against Marriage 29 HARV. C.R.-C.L. L. REV. 505
(1994) Joseph
W. Hovermill, A Conflict of Laws and Morals: The Choice of Law
Implications of Hawaii's Recognition of Same-Sex Marriage 53 MD.
L. REV. 450 (1994) Christopher
J. Keller, Comment, Divining the Priest: A Case Comment on
Baehr v. Lewin 12 LAW & INEQ. J. 483 (1994) Andrew
Koppelman, Why Discrimination Against Lesbians and Gay Men Is Sex
Discrimination 69 N.Y.U.L. REV. 197 (1994) Scott
K. Kozuma, Note, Baehr v. Lewin and Same-Sex Marriage: The
Continued Struggle for Social, Political and Human Legitimacy 30
WILLIAMETTE L. REV. 891 (1994) Arthur
S. Leonard, Lesbian and Gay Families and the Law: A Progress Report
21 FORDHAM URB. L.J. 927 (1994) Jorge
Martin, Note, English Polygamy Law and the Danish Registered
Partnership Act: A Case for the Consistent Treatment of Foreign
Polygamous Marriages and Danish Same-Sex Marriages in England 27
CORNELL INT'L L.J. 419 (1994) Jeanine
Perella McConaghy, Comment, Constitutional Law--Hawaii Subjects
Sex-Based Classifications to Strict Scrutiny Analysis--Baehr v.
Lewin, 28 SUFFOLK U.L. REV. 164 (1994) Candace
L. Sage, Note, Sister-State Recognition of Valid Same-Sex
Marriages; Baehr v. Lewin--How Will It Play in Peoria? 28
IND. L. REV. 115 (1994) Jeffrey
J. Swart, Comment, The Wedding Luau--Who Is Invited?: Hawaii,
Same-Sex Marriage, and Emerging Realities 43 EMORY L.J. 1577
(1994) James
D. Wilets, International Human Rights Law and Sexual Orientation
18 HASTINGS INT'L & COMP. L. REV. 1 (1994) Evan
Wolfson, Crossing the Threshold: Equal Marriage Rights for Lesbians
and Gay Men and the Intra-Community Critique 21 N.Y.U. REV. L.
& SOC. CHANGE 567 (1994-95) Kevin
A. Zambrowicz, Comment, "To Love and Honor All the Days of
Your Life": A Constitutional Right to Same-Sex Marriage? 43
CATH. U. L. REV. 907 (1994)
Joseph
G. Arsenault, Comment, "Family" but Not
"Parent": The Same-Sex Coupling Jurisprudence of the New
York Court of Appeals 58 ALB. L. REV. 813 (1995) Habib
A. Balian, Note, 'Til Death Do Us Part: Granting Full Faith and
Credit to Marital Status 68 S. CAL. L. REV. 397 (1995) Jennifer
Gerarda Brown, Competitive Federalism and the Legislative
Incentives to Recognize Same-Sex Marriage 68 S. CAL. L. REV. 745
(1995) Megan
E. Farrell, Note, Baehr v. Lewin: Questionable Reasoning; Sound
Judgment 11 J. CONTEMP. HEALTH L. & POL'Y 589 (1995) *Robert
P. George & Gerard V. Bradley, Marriage and the Liberal
Imagination 84 GEO. L.J. 301 (1995) Christine
Jax, Same- Sex Marriage--Why Not? 4 WIDENER J. PUB. L. 461
(1995) Thomas
M. Keane, Note, Aloha, Marriage? Constitutional and Choice of Law
Arguments for Recognition of Same-Sex Marriages,47 STAN. L. REV.
499 (1995) Richard
D. Mohr, The Case for Gay Marriage 9 NOTRE DAME J. L. ETHICS
& PUB. POL'Y 215 (1995)
*Leonard
G. Brown III, Comment, Constitutionally Defending Marriage: The
Defense of Marriage Act, Romer v. Evans and the Cultural Battle they
Represent 19 CAMPBELL L.REV. 159 (1996) *Teresa
Stanton Collett, Marriage, Family and the Positive Law 10 NOTRE
DAME J. L. ETHICS & PUB. POL'Y. 467 (1996) *Richard
F. Duncan, Homosexual Marriage and the Myth of Tolerance 10
NOTRE DAME J.L. ETHICS & PUB. POL'Y. 587 (1996) *Lynne
Marie Kohm, The Homosexual "Union": Should Gay and
Lesbian Partnerships Be Granted the Same Status as Marriage? 22 J.
CONTEMP. L. 51 (1996) *Lynne
Marie Kohm, A Reply to "Principles and Prejudice":
Marriage and the Realization that Principles Win Over Political Will
22 J. CONTEMP. L. 293 (1996) *Lynn
D. Wardle, A Critical Analysis of Constitutional Claims for
Same-Sex Marriage 1996 BYU L. REV. 1, 87 (1996) Evan
Wolfson & Michael F. Melcher, The Supreme Court's Decision in
Romer v. Evans and Its Implications for the Defense of Marriage Act 16
Quinnipiac L.Rev. 217 (1996) Evan
Wolfson & Michael F. Melcher, Constitutional and Legal Defects
in the "Defense of Marriage" Act 16 Quinnipiac L.Rev.
221 (1996)
Paige
E. Chabora, Congress' Power Under the Full Faith and Credit Clause
and the Defense of Marriage Act of 1996 76 NEB. L.REV. 604 (1997) *David
Orgon Coolidge, Same-Sex Marriage? Baehr v. Miike and the
Meaning of Marriage 38 S. TEX. L. REV. 1 (1997) James
M. Donovan, DOMA: An Unconstitutional Establishment of Fundamentalist
Christianity 4 MICH. J. GENDER & L. 335 (1997) *Richard
F. Duncan, The Narrow and Shallow Bite of Romer and the
Eminent Rationality of Dual-gender Marriage: A (Partial) Response to
Professor Koppelman 6 WM. & MARY BILL RTS. J. 147 (1997) Ann
Laquer Estin, When Baehr Meets Romer: Family Law
Issues After Amendment 2 68 U. COLO. L. REV. 349 (1997) *John
Finnis, The Good of Marriage and the Morality of Sexual Relations:
Some Philosophical and Historical Observations 42 AM. J.
JURISPRUDENCE 97 (1997) Rex
Glensy, Note, The Extent of Congress' Power Under the Full Faith
and Credit Clause 71 S. CAL. L.REV. 137 (1997) Diane
M. Guillerman, Comment, The Defense of Marriage Act: The Latest
Maneuver in the Continuing Battle to Legalize Same-Sex Marriage 34
HOUS. L.REV. 425 (1997) Julie
L.B. Johnson, Comment, The Meaning of "General Laws": The
Extent of Congress's Power Under the Full Faith and Credit Clause and
the Constitutionality of the Defense of Marriage Act 145 U. PA.
L.REV. 1611 (1997) *Timothy
Joseph Keefer, Note, DOMA as a Defensible Exercise of Congressional
Power Under the Full-Faith-and-Credit Clause 54 WASH. & LEE.
L.REV. 1635 (1997) Jon-Peter
Kelly, Note, Act of Infidelity: Why the Defense of Marriage Act is
Unfaithful to the Constitution 7 CORNELL J.L. & PUB. POL'Y 203
(1997) Andrew
Koppelman, Dumb and DOMA: Why the Defense of Marriage Act is
Unconstitutional 83 IOWA L.REV. 1 (1997) Melissa
A. Provost, Comment, Disregarding the Constitution in the Name of
Defending Marriage: The Unconstitutionality of the Defense of Marriage
Act 8 SETON HALL CONST. L.J. 157 (1997) Barbara
A. Robb, Note, The Constitutionality of the Defense of Marriage Act
in the Wake of Romer v. Evans 32 NEW ENG. L.REV. 263 (1997) Melissa
Rothstein, The Defense of Marriage Act and Federalism: A States'
Rights Argument in Defense of Same-Sex Marriages 31 FAM. L.Q. 571
(1997) Scott
Ruskay-Kidd, The Defense of Marriage Act and the Overextension of
Congressional Authority 97 COLUM. L.REV. 1435 (1997) Mark
Strasser, Statutory Construction, Equal Protection, and the
Amendment Process: On Romer, Hunter, and Efforts to Tame
Baehr 45 BUFF. L. REV. 739 (1997) Mark
Strasser, Loving the Romer Out for Baehr : On Acts in
Defense of Marriage and the Constitution 58 U. PITT. L. REV. 279
(1997) Mark
Strasser, Statutory Construction, Equal Protection, and the
Amendment Process: On Romer, Hunter, and Efforts to Tame
Baehr 45 BUFF. L. REV. 739 (1997) Mark
Strasser, Judicial Good Faith and the Baehr Essentials: On
Giving Credit Where Its Due 28 RUTGERS L.J. 313 (1997) Mark
Tanney, Note, The Defense of Marriage Act: A "Bare Desire to
Harm" an Unpopular Minority Cannot Constitute a Legitimate
Governmental Interest 19 THOMAS JEFFERSON L.REV. 99 (1997) Sherri
L. Toussaint, Comment, Defense of Marriage Act: Isn't It Ironic . .
. Don't You Think? A Little Too Ironic? 76 Neb. L.Rev. 924 (1997) Alec
Walen, The "Defense of Marriage Act" and Authoritarian
Morality 5 WM. & MARY BILL RTS. J. 619 (1997) *Lynn
D. Wardle, The Potential Impact of Homosexual Parenting on Children
1997 U. Illinois L.Rev. 833 (1997) E.
Todd Wilkowski, Comment, The Defense of Marriage Act: Will it Be
the Final Word in the Debate Over Legal Recognition of Same-Sex
Unions? 8 REGENT U. L.REV. 195 (1997) Evan
Wolfson & Michael F. Melcher, DOMA's House Divided: An Argument
Against the Defense of Marriage Act 44 FED. LAW. 30 (Sep. 1997)
*Anita
K. Blair, Constitutional Equal Protection, Strict Scrutiny and the
Politics of Marriage Law 47 CATH. U. L.REV. 1231 (1998) *Patrick
J. Borchers, Baker v. General Motors: Implications for
Interjurisdictional Recognition of Non-Traditional Marriages 32
CREIGHTON L.REV. 147 (1998) Charles
J. Butler, Note, The Defense of Marriage Act: Congress's Use of
Narrative in the Debate Over Same-Sex Marriage 73 N.Y.U. L.REV.
841 (1998) *Teresa
Stanton Collett, Recognizing Same-Sex Marriage: Asking for the
Impossible? 47 CATH. U. L. REV. 1245 (1998) *David
Orgon Coolidge, Playing the Loving Card: 'Same-Sex Marriage'
and the Politics of Analogy 12 BYU J. OF PUB. LAW 201 (1998) *David
Orgon Coolidge & William C. Duncan, Definition or
Discrimination?: State Marriage Recognition Statutes in the "Same
Sex Marriage" Debate 32 CREIGHTON L.REV. 3 (1998) *Daniel
A. Crane, The Original Understanding of the "Effects
Clause" or Article IV, Section 1 and Implications for the Defense
of Marriage Act 6 GEO. MASON L.REV. 307 (1998) *Robert
A. Destro, Law and the Politics of Marriage: Loving v. Virginia
After 30 Years 47 CATH. U. L.REV. 1207 (1998) *Dwight
Duncan & Peter Lubin, Follow the Footnote or the Advocate as
Historian of Same-Sex Marriage 47 CATH. U. L. REV. 1271 (1998) *Richard
F. Duncan, "They Call Me 'Eight Eyes'": Hardwick's
Respectability, Romer's Narrowness and Same-Sex Marriage 32
CREIGHTON L.REV. 241 (1998) *Richard
F. Duncan, From Loving to Romer: Homosexual Marriage
and Moral Discernment 12 BYU J. PUB. L. 239 (1998) Tisha
Morris Federico, The Impact of the Defense of Marriage Act on
Section 302 of the Bankruptcy Code and the Resulting Renewed Interest
in the Equitable Doctrine of Substantive Consolidation 103 COM.
L.J. 82 (1998) Heather
Hamilton, Comment, The Defense of Marriage Act: A Critical Analysis
of Its Constitutionality Under the Full Faith and Credit Clause 47
DEPAUL L.REV. (1998) *Maurice
J. Holland, The Modest Usefulness of DOMA Section 2 32
CREIGHTON L.REV. 395 (1998) *Lynn
Marie Kohm, Liberty and Marriage-Baehr and Beyond: Due
Process in 1998 12 BYU J. PUB. L. 253 (1998) Jenni
R. Shuki-Kunze, Note, The "Defenseless" Marriage Act: The
Constitutionality of the Defense of Marriage Act as an Extension of
Congressional Power Under the Full Faith and Credit Clause 48 CASE
W. RES. L.REV. 351 (1998) Samuel
A. Marcosson, Romer And The Limits of Legitimacy: Stripping
Opponents of Gay And Lesbian Rights of Their "First Line of
Defense" in The Same-sex Marriage Fight 24 J. CONTEMP. L. 217
(1998) *Richard
S. Myers, Same-Sex "Marriage" and the Public Policy
Doctrine 32 CREIGHTON L.REV. 45, 57 (1998) *Rev.
Raymond C. O'Brien, Single-Gender Marriage: A Religious Perspective 7
TEMPLE POL. & CIV. RTS. L. REV. 429 (1998) James
M. Patten, Comment, The Defense of Marriage Act: How Congress Said
"No" to Full Faith and Credit and the Constitution 38
SANTA CLARA L.REV. 939 (1998) *Jeffrey
L. Rensberger, Same-Sex Marriages and the Defense of Marriage Act:
A Deviant View of an Experiment in Full Faith and Credit 32
CREIGHTON L.REV. 409 (1998) *Jay
Alan Sekulow & John Tuskey, Sex and Sodomy and Apples and
Oranges--Does the Constitution Require States to Grant a Right to Do
the Impossible 12 BYU J. PUB. L. 309 (1998) Mark
Strasser, Constitutional Limitations and Baehr
Possibilities: On Retroactive Legislation, Reasonable Expectations,
and Manifest Injustice 29 RUTGERS L.J. 271 (1998) Mark
Strasser, Ex Post Facto Laws, Bills of Attainder, and the
Definition of Punishment: On DOMA, the Hawaii Amendment and Federal
Constitutional Constraints 48 SYRACUSE L.REV. 227 (1998) *Lynn
D. Wardle, Revisiting DOMA: Protecting Federalism in Family Law
58 OR. ST. B. BULL. 21 (June 1998) *Lynn
D. Wardle, DOMA: Protecting Federalism in Family Law 45 FED.
LAW. 30 (Feb. 1998) *Lynn
D. Wardle, Legal Claims for Same-Sex Marriage: Efforts to
Legitimate a Retreat from Marriage by Redefining Marriage 39 S.
TEX. L. REV. 735 (1998) *Lynn
D. Wardle, Loving v. Virginia and the Constitutional Right to
Marry, 1790-1990 41 HOWARD L. J. 289 (1998) *Lynn
D. Wardle, Williams v. North Carolina, Divorce Recognition, and
Same-Sex Marriage Recognition 32 CREIGHTON L.REV. 187 (1998) *Ralph
U. Whitten, The Original Understanding of the Full Faith and Credit
Clause and DOMA 32 CREIGHTON L.REV. 255 (1998) Evan
Wolfson & Michael F. Melcher, A House Divided: An Argument
Against the Defense of Marriage Act 58 OR. ST. B. BULL. 17 (Jan
1998)
Philip
L. Bartlett II, Same Sex Marriage 36 HARV. J. ON LEGIS. 581
(1999) Mary
Bonauto, Susan M. Murray & Beth Robinson, Brief, The Freedom to
Marry for Same Sex Couples: The Opening Appellate Brief of Plaintiffs
Stan Baker Et Al. In Baker v. State 5 MICH. J. GENDER & L. 409
(1999) Mary
Bonauto, Susan M. Murray & Beth Robinson, Brief, The Freedom to
Marry for Same Sex Couples: The Reply Brief of Plaintiffs Stan Baker
Et Al. In Baker v. State 6 MICH. J. GENDER & L. 1 (1999) Edward
Brumby, Note, What Is In a Name: Why the European Same-Sex
Partnership Acts Create a Valid Marital Relationship 28 GA. J.
INT'L. & COMPL. L. 145 (1999) David
L. Chambers & Nancy D. Polikoff, Family Law and Gay and Lesbian
Family Issues in the Twentieth Century 33 FAM. L.Q. 523 (1999) *Kevin
G. Clarkson, David Orgon Coolidge & William C. Duncan, The
Alaska Marriage Amendment: The People's Choice on the Last Frontier
16 ALASKA LAW REVIEW 213 (1999) Stanley
E. Cox, DOMA and Conflicts Law: Congressional Rules and Domestic
Relations Conflicts Law 32 CREIGHTON L. REV. 1063 (1999) Linda
S. Eckols, The Marriage Mirage: The Personal and Social Identity
Implications of Same-Gender Matrimony 5 MICH. J. GENDER & L.
353 (1999) Scott
Fruehwald, Choice of Law and Same-Sex Marriage 51 FLA. L. REV.
799 (1999) Elizabeth
Kristen, The Struggle for Same-Sex Marriage Continues 14
BERKELEY WOMEN=S L.J. 104 (1999) Mae
Kuykendall, Resistance to Same-Sex Marriage as a Story About
Language: Linguistic Failure and the Priority of a Living Language
34 HARV. C.R.-C.L. L. REV. 385 (1999) Edward
H. Sadtler, Note, A Right to Same-Sex Marriage Under International
Law: Can It Be Vindicated in the United States 40 VA. J. INT=L. L.
405 (1999) Mark
Strasser, From Colorado to Alaska by Way of Cincinnati: On Romer,
Equality Foundation, and the Constitutionality of Referenda 36
HOUSTON L. REV. 1193 (1999) Laura
Weinstock, Illegally Yours 10 HASTINGS WOMEN'S L.J. 447 (1999) Kristian
D. Whitten, Section Three of the Defense of Marriage Act: Is
Marriage Reserved to the States? 26 HASTINGS CONST. L.Q. 419
(1999)
Listing not yet available.
*Articles
Defending Traditional Marriage
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Copyright © 2001 - 2010 The Catholic University of America. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
